Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there.
Changed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=82836 --- shadow/82836 2007-09-13 10:38:52.000000000 -0400 +++ shadow/82836.tmp.16480 2007-09-13 11:34:43.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ Bug#: 82836 Product: Mono: Class Libraries Version: 1.2 -OS: +OS: unknown OS Details: Status: NEW Resolution: -Severity: +Severity: Unknown Priority: Normal Component: Mono.POSIX AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TargetMilestone: --- @@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ case... ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-13 10:38 ------- Created an attachment (id=20034) test case + +------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-13 11:34 ------- +What should be the correct behavior with a 0-length buffer? + +More specifically, should write(2) still be called if the buffer +contains no data, or should write(2) be skipped? + +The write(2) man page suggests that a `count' of 0 does nothing, so +skipping the write(2) call would probably work... + _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
