https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352210
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352210#c5 --- Comment #5 from Mads Dydensborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-09 11:13:01 MST --- (In reply to comment #4 from Atsushi Enomoto) > The fix caused regression on the buildbot, so it is reverted. Strangely it's > perfectly working on my box so I wonder if I can fix this WORKSFORME issue. > Hmm. I tested svn this morning, with your changes, and they made my problem go away. On my setup there are differences: the linux box outputs what I reported, the Windows something else. Your fix changed this, such that the linux outputted the same as the Windows box, and the date did not "shift". I tried running my testprogram again on another box. Here are some results: box 1: Linux 2 core Intel Xeon, running Kubuntu Gutsy, under vmware box 2: Linux 8 core AMD opteron, running debian 4.0 mono --version | box | result 1.2.4 tarball | 1 | OK 1.2.6 tarball | 1 | NOT OK 1.2.6 svn r92488 | 1 | OK 1.2.2.1 package | 2 | OK 1.2.6 tarball | 2 | NOT OK I did not note the version I ran on prior to your patches, but it was SVN as of the morning I wrote my first mail: Monday the 6/1, at about 04:00 UTC. Please advise on how to provide more data/information to support "my case". Did you try running the testprogram on a "pure" 1.2.6 tarball? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
