https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387162
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387162#c3 --- Comment #3 from Rodrigo Kumpera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-06 09:12:41 MST --- Well, the code is valid, but not verifiable. The verifier refuses it as verifiable, thou not for the right reason. Mono's JIT can't handle all kinds of "valid" code. Which is good IMHO. What happens here is that the MS runtime accepts as verifiable a broader set than what ECMA 335 say. I have spoted a lot of cases where peverify say the method is unverifiable but the runtime runs it just fine. The most common case is that it performs DCE on constant value branches and you can put any kind of trash on the dead part. But it doesn't work on a 100% basis so it's not something I'm planing on reproducing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
