https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387693
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387693#c3 Atsushi Enomoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #213153|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Atsushi Enomoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-07 13:33:41 MST --- Created an attachment (id=213292) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=213292) proposed XplatUIX11 fix Yeah, looks like XplatUIX11 does not do things right - it does not put WM_QUIT to the correct event queue, and it does not process WM_QUIT when the object is being destroyed (it ignores *every* message, including our own ClientMessage). I'm not sure if the attached patch is always safe though; it processes every ClientMessage on a control that are being destroyed. At least NUnit tests pass. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
