https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387712
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=387712#c1 Raja Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Raja Harinath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-07 20:23:37 MST --- The ECMA 335 standard says: (Partition III, Section 3.35) An endfinally instruction can only appear lexically within a finally block. Unlike the endfilter instruction, there is no requirement that the block end with an endfinally instruction, and there can be as many endfinally instructions within the block as required. ... endfinally empties the evaluation stack as a side-effect. Making this one-byte IL instruction perfectly suited for that situation, and to replace 5 IL bytes occupied by the pop+br. So, it's a Reflector bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
