https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379524
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379524#c4 Zoltan Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Zoltan Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-12 18:00:05 MST --- We currently fail this test because QueueUserAPC is not signal safe. Other than the various proposed rewrites of the suspend/abort code, it could be made signal safe fairly easily by noticing that mono only calls this function in one place with a dummy argument, so instead of managing an apc list, we could have one bit in the thread handle structure saying whenever the thread has an APC queued or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
