https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324134
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324134#c27 --- Comment #27 from Andreas Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-19 14:42:05 MST --- Geoff, Thanks, here you go: Program received signal EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION, Illegal instruction/operand. 0x000000010078d1b0 in ?? () (gdb) x/16i $sp-16 0x7fff5fbff290: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff294: .long 0x833758 0x7fff5fbff298: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff29c: .long 0xae914 0x7fff5fbff2a0: .long 0x7fff 0x7fff5fbff2a4: rlwnm r31,r29,r30,13,24 0x7fff5fbff2a8: .long 0x0 0x7fff5fbff2ac: .long 0x3 0x7fff5fbff2b0: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2b4: .long 0xaea04 0x7fff5fbff2b8: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2bc: .long 0x4013f0 0x7fff5fbff2c0: .long 0x0 0x7fff5fbff2c4: .long 0x0 0x7fff5fbff2c8: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2cc: .long 0x41ddf0 (gdb) x/16i $sp 0x7fff5fbff2a0: .long 0x7fff 0x7fff5fbff2a4: rlwnm r31,r29,r30,13,24 0x7fff5fbff2a8: .long 0x0 0x7fff5fbff2ac: .long 0x3 0x7fff5fbff2b0: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2b4: .long 0xaea04 0x7fff5fbff2b8: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2bc: .long 0x4013f0 0x7fff5fbff2c0: .long 0x0 0x7fff5fbff2c4: .long 0x0 0x7fff5fbff2c8: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2cc: .long 0x41ddf0 0x7fff5fbff2d0: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2d4: .long 0x4013f0 0x7fff5fbff2d8: .long 0x1 0x7fff5fbff2dc: .long 0x8dd28 To me, this doesn't look like JIT'ed code with all those weird .long values. (gdb) bt #0 0x000000010078d1b0 in ?? () #1 0x00000001000aea04 in create_exception_two_strings (klass=0x100832b58, a1=0x10041ddf0, a2=0x0) at ../../../../mono/mono/metadata/exception.c:127 #2 0x000000010008de94 in mono_runtime_init (domain=0x1004013f0, start_cb=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>, attach_cb=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>) at ./../../../mono/mono/metadata/appdomain.c:178 #3 0x0000000100008fb0 in mini_init (filename=0x7fff5fbff93b "../../../testassembly.exe", runtime_version=0x0) at ./../../../mono/mono/mini/mini.c:13543 #4 0x000000010004884c in mono_main (argc=2, argv=<value temporarily unavailable, due to optimizations>) at ../../../../mono/mono/mini/driver.c:1402 #5 0x00000001000017c4 in start () In the backtrace I notice that mono_runtime_invoke is not mentioned, but according to my printfs it does not return from there - does this indicate stack corruption? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
