https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351708
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351708#c3 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Molaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-05 03:34:28 MDT --- The processor architecture is already exposed in MonoReflectionAssemblyName. The MonoAssemblyName change requires API/ABI changes: if we introduce an ABI break it should be not only for this fairly insignificant issue, but also for the other API and ABI issues we have (at least the major ones that can be addressed in the time left we have). This means though that the time to do the changes needs to be scheduled and you never wanted to do that. If you changed your mind it's ok with me to do these changes as it is what I always wanted to do for mono 2.0 and you where opposed to the idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
