http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492778
User [email protected] added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492778#c14 --- Comment #14 from Raja Harinath <[email protected]> 2009-04-08 21:55:25 MDT --- I would rather just have method = find_method (in_class, ..., klass); + if (!method && in_class != klass) { + method = find_method (klass, ..., klass); + if (method) + g_warning ("your code may be depending on non-standard semantics" ..); + } The issue is that the signature was inflated prematurely when the assembly was created. Re-inflating it again is a bad idea, imho. I think the above semantic is at least defendable: "If you can't match it against the GTD, see if you can match with just the type itself." Caveat, I haven't tested this code at all :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
