http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316921
User [email protected] added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316921#c5 --- Comment #5 from Gert Driesen <[email protected]> 2009-08-08 03:53:05 MDT --- Created an attachment (id=311451) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=311451) Alternate approach Reduces time from 8347ms to 491ms - compared 671 for MS - without increasing in-memory size of (Mono)Type. If we want to add more caching of often used - and expensive to compute - information, then I would prefer doing this in the runtime. I know that we'd still have the managed to unmanaged overhead, but then we could at least benefit from it in the runtime as well. For example: wouldn't moving MonoTypeInfo - or just the full_name field - to unmanaged code (and using it in the runtime) outbenefit the managed to unmanaged overhead? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
