http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539394
User [email protected] added comment http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539394#c22 --- Comment #22 from Brett Kiefer <[email protected]> 2009-11-04 13:45:34 MST --- Completely understood -- what I'm saying is that we'd really like to help test, since we know we're exercising the code path and are interested in making sure the fix is solid. But we can't bump our runtime to the latest trunk mono right now, so I thought I would do a cowboy backport to 2.4 so that we can test that. What I meant by "Zoltan's objections' in my comment was that I didn't thoroughly understand the exception propagation concern you voiced in Comment #18, so I wasn't at all sure that my backport patch was correct. The long and short of it is that unless we hear something else, we'll do some testing with the patch I attached here, but wait to hear from you before going to production with anything. Once you are satisfied and have backported the change, just let us know and we'll be happy to patch our 2.4.2.3 and test it out. Does that all make sense? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
