https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632611
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632611#c3 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> 2010-08-20 12:29:34 UTC --- On retrospect, claiming that monodroid.exe is buggy wrt (B) is wrong. How is monodroid.exe supposed to know which sub-elements of <activity/> it should preserve, which it should drop, and which it should create? To preserve sanity, it can't, meaning if the developer wants to provide an activity-specific label, they'll also need to provide the entire <activity/> element, including the nested <intent-filter/> element. So unless someone can think of a (D) semantic which makes sense, won't result in the tooling stepping on the toes of developers, and works... I'm out of ideas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
