https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656002
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656002#c2 Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> 2010-11-27 13:55:38 UTC --- This is desired behavior. There's no reasonable way for monodroid to know which parts of AndroidManifest.xml to keep vs. overwrite from the code, so the current "priority" order is: 1. monodroid command-line args (e.g. --application) 2. Template AndroidManifest.xml contents 3. Source code attributes For example, what if we changed your example so that MyApp [Application] attribute used "@string/app_name2" instead of "@string/app_name" for ApplicationAttribute.Label? Which should be used, the [Application] value or the AndroidManifest.xml value? As per the above priority list, we use the AndroidManifest.xml value. > If I need any customizations within my Manifest I need an <application> > element > thus eliminating the ability to specify the attribute in code. Exactly; if attributes are not flexible enough for your needs, then simply use the XML directly. You might also consider filing bugs so we can add additional attributes to remove the need to modify the XML directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
