https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497017
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497017#c1 --- Comment #1 from David Eisner <david.eis...@oriel.oxon.org> 2011-07-21 23:13:40 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=441598) --> (http://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=441598) Minimal patch for XPath position() function I will put a related fix and test cases on github for review, but this simple patch should be enough to get your [position()=n] predicates working, if your test case is a good representation of the problem you have in your application. There is also a workaround, by the way, if you are at liberty to remove the explicit reference to the position() function, as the [n] notation is actually interpretted differently and appears to have been corrected for reverse axes. More testing is probably needed on this, and especially for other axes such as ancestor-or-self and preceeding. It seems, in my assessment, that optimization attempts and uncertainty about this ordering issue have left some of this implementation difficult to inspect for correctness and small boundary errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - mono-bugs@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs
