Hi, > > Actually it doesn't at all, I'm not sure it's even legal. > > Moreover, please read:http://www.mono-project.com/Contributingespecially: > > ?Do not use the ildasm, reflector or other equivalent tools program > to disassemble proprietary code when you are planning to reimplement a > class for Mono. If you have done this, we will not be able to use your > code.? >
Understood. Sorry if it makes you feel uncomfortable. Please delete my post if it's illegel. > > It's not an easy problem. I've been told about the DecoderFallback and > EncoderFallback solutions on .net 2, the issue is that Cecil have to > be .net 1.1 compatible, and I would like to avoid playing the ifdef > game. > > There's still the possibility to use the .net 1.1 code from Mono I > could investigate. But it's a workaround an issue with the framework, > not with Cecil, so it's not really a top priority. > Understood. Although it's a framework issue, it decrease availability of Cecil for Cecil is an assembly library. I think to use Mono codes should be a best way, or to write a new simple Unicode decode function for Cecil might be ok (I don't mean to copy/paste codes in my last post :D). Anyway, many thanks for your great Cecil. Regards Wicky --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- mono-cecil -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---