On 4/8/09, Daniel Grunwald <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with this. Cecil cannot be able to round-trip all kinds of > invalid assemblies that obfuscators could produce. > Obfuscator writers are just too clever coming up with invalid assemblies > that MS happens to accept. > > I think it's sufficient if Cecil is able to read those assemblies - then > one could write a clean-up step (e.g. dead code removal) to fix the > invalid assembly before saving it.
Definitely. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- mono-cecil -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
