Hi, On 7/31/09, sergiy.sakharov <[email protected]> wrote: > So, the first block was actually fixed, however second one remained > untouched. > Actually I'm not sure about workarounds yet, except for checking all custom > attributes in assembly...
It's not about working it around. It's not a bug. The custom attribute contain a string representation of a type, you'd have to modify them yourself.. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- mono-cecil -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
