Tuna, you are wrong. As far as Cecil is concerned, the one at svn://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/mcs/class/Mono.Cecil is more current than the one in Mono daily build. I checked both and the Changelog for the svn has latest entries than the daily build.
Can somebody confirm this and also if this is what you mean by 'SVN head'? On Aug 17, 7:13 pm, JohnC <[email protected]> wrote: > But it can be a pain to download whole package each day. Can you tell > me the SVN equivalent of the daily drop? > > On Aug 17, 5:28 pm, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nope, this onehttp://mono.ximian.com/daily/ > > > <http://mono.ximian.com/daily/>Easier than checking out the svn > > > Tuna Toksöz > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitt... > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, JohnC <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > For 'latest daily drop', is this the correct SVN URL: > > > svn://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source/trunk/mcs/class/Mono.Cecil > > > > Also, is this the same as 'SVN head' that everybody keeps mentioning? > > > > Sorry, but I am not that familiar with SVN terminology. > > > > On Aug 17, 2:25 pm, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > > On 8/16/09, kernelpanic99 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm > > > > > using Cecil 0.6 stable. Do you think it's worth trying this out on > > > > > the > > > > > latest unstable build? > > > > > Cecil 0.6 is by no mean stable. Use the latest daily drop. > > > > > -- > > > > Jb Evain <[email protected]> > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ -- mono-cecil -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
