On 28 Mar., 09:00, rubenmch <[email protected]> wrote: > When accepting unknown versions, should the original version also be > preserved to write it back when saving the assembly?
Yes, that could surely make sense. However, there could be cases where you wouldn't always want to write back the original version, say if Cecil is being used to alter the target framework of an assembly. > Also, could you post the modopt fix you talk about, or is it the one > posted in the 2008 modopt bug thread? That was is, yes. No changes since then, so no need to repost it. But the url is: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00737.html While the patch worked fine and was standards-compliant it presumably broke some other compiler's (gnu c#?) malformed output. Jb would prefer not to break that, but that was not an easy fix/hack - and so I guess it just was forgotten. Richard -- -- mono-cecil To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mono-cecil+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
