Hey, On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Thorsten Kramp <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this a known issue with 0.6 or do I miss something here? If it is > an issue with 0.6, is this fixed in the current version? As the API > has changed quite bit between 0.6 and 0.9.x, I would like to confirm > this first before spending the effort.
0.6 won't quite be maintained. Switching over to 0.9 is not really a big deal, most issues are described on the wiki. I strongly suggest you switch to 0.9 and report any bug you'd have, as pdb handling really improved. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil
