When I have a MethodReference or TypeReference representing a generic method
call / object instance, calling Resolve() seems to eliminate the generic
arguments, resulting in invalid references in the CIL code. Is this
intentional?
The problem is that I need to call Resolve(), then manipulate the resulting
definition object, and I also have to preserve (and manipulate) the generic
arguments (if any).

Any hints?

Thank you!

-- 
--
mono-cecil

Reply via email to