Cecil 0.6 was very stable and mature owing to almost 5-6 years of development, bug-reports and fixes.
I recently took a look at 0.9.3 and I see that it is a nearly 100% rewrite. The design and implementation of reading and writing assemblies has changed a lot. As a result when someone migrates from 0.6 to 0.9, API-breaking changes are not the only thing he has to deal with - I would even say its a minor thing. Even more important than that is that he is going back to using a 3 month mature product. Please do not take this the wrong way, I am sure you have taken your best efforts to write bug-free code and do testing, but the fact remains that the new code base is only 3 month mature. Can you provide any insight if and why the above may not be true? Am I incorrect in the above analysis? Thanks John -- -- mono-cecil
