On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Simon Goldschmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > what's the status of API stability, anyway?
Nothing is set in stone before 1.0, but I don't think the cloneable types (*Definition) will change. > I'm not really finished yet with Mono.Merge -> Cecil 0.9, but once I am, I'd > be really happy if the Clone functions could be added to Cecil.Rocks so they > won't go out of sync when cecil changes. Well, there's no hurry as long as yours work fine for you, and then when they get implemented in Cecil.Rocks we can check that they work for you. > BTW: Thanks for such a great tool! I especially like the new 0.9 API! Nice to hear! -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil
