On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Simon Goldschmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, the old merger iterates over them and drops duplicates (and adjusts them > to the merged references, I think). I didn't yet get to the point where I can > test whether that's really needed or not.
It's not needed with 0.9, as it ensures there's no duplicate type ref and member ref. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil
