On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Timwi <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, in that case then surely there should be no special > GenericParameter instances for the instance types; they should be the > same instance as the ones for the TypeDefinition, right?
Except in some cases where some compilers will use a TypeReference as a DeclaringType instead of the TypeDefinition, yes. > So if I can > generate a testcase that generates a GenericParameter instance whose > Owner is a GenericInstanceType, then this is a bug, right? Indeed so. Most indeedly. -- Jb Evain <[email protected]> -- -- mono-cecil
