Hi Jb,

> Not necessarily. If they're not implemented it's because they're not
> trivial to implement using the fast metadata reader, of because they
> don't exactly map to a Cecil construct.

yes, I agree after having a look at the specification...

> I suggest you index what you need before hand, and use your own indexes.

That would mean that I have to iterate over each single construct in
the assembly...
You do not like to implement a method like GetMetadataTables(), don't
you...? ;-)

Regards,
Joachim

-- 
--
mono-cecil

Reply via email to