Yep that's what I figured. ok, thanks!

Greg

Je te doit une biere a montreal.

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, it's hard to distinguish them otherwise considering that there's
> 4 opcodes:
>
> stfld // store field
> ldfld // load field
>
> stsfld // store static field
> ldsfld // load static field
>
> The only other way would be to analyze their stack behavior for pop
> and push, but it seems kind of awkward when you can simply switch on
> the .Code of the opcode.
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Greg Young <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to distinguish between a read and a write of various
> > kinds of fields or just switch off the opcodes?
> >
> > --
> > Les erreurs de grammaire et de syntaxe ont été incluses pour m'assurer de
> > votre attention
> >
> > --
> > --
> > mono-cecil
>
> --
> --
> mono-cecil




-- 
Les erreurs de grammaire et de syntaxe ont été incluses pour m'assurer de
votre attention

-- 
--
mono-cecil

Reply via email to