On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah beautiful that's what I was hoping you would say :) Already have code
> doing that elsewhere, just got confused based on the output in strings as I
> expected it to get replaced with the caller context name.
> Will go write it now in fact :)

Cool. As a side note, you will need to differentiate the type of the
generic parameter, as they can be declared by either a method or a
type. So you have to deal with that when retrieving the argument from
the generic context.

You also have to deal with typespecs, for instance arrays (T[]), or
byrefs types (T&).

Jb

-- 
--
mono-cecil

Reply via email to