But you mentioned that the typereferences will still keep the module alive (thus all typereferences will be kept alive). Or am I misunderstanding you?
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Greg Young <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hmm so how to proceed? I can build up a model on top of cecil but that > would > > be *a lot* of duplication. > > As I suggested earlier, you can simply walk through a TypeDefinition, > and set the module of every type you encounter to null. It kind of > underlines the lack of visitor for Cecil, but for all the prototypes > I've wrote, I've never been happy with the outcome. So walking the > graph manually should do for now. > > Jb > > -- > --Bmono-cecil -- Les erreurs de grammaire et de syntaxe ont été incluses pour m'assurer de votre attention -- -- mono-cecil
