Hi,

It's missing the top of the stacktrace, so it's hard to say.

First of all, are you sure that only one thread is accessing a module at a time?

Also, are you sharing one assembly resolver for all your modules?

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> When running with cecil code multi-threaded I occasionally get exceptions
> like the following
> "   at Mono.Cecil.MetadataReader.ReadTypes() in
> S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\AssemblyReader.cs:line 679\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.ModuleDefinition.<get_Types>b__8(ModuleDefinition _,
> MetadataReader reader) in S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\ModuleDefinition.cs:line
> 365\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.ModuleDefinition.Read[TItem,TRet](TItem item, Func`3 read)
> in S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\ModuleDefinition.cs:line 747\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.ModuleDefinition.get_Types() in
> S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\ModuleDefinition.cs:line 365\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.ModuleDefinition.GetType(String namespace, String name) in
> S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\ModuleDefinition.cs:line 474\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.MetadataResolver.GetType(ModuleDefinition module,
> TypeReference type) in S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\MetadataResolver.cs:line
> 74\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.MetadataResolver.Resolve(IAssemblyResolver resolver,
> TypeReference type) in S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\MetadataResolver.cs:line
> 54\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.ModuleDefinition.Resolve(TypeReference type) in
> S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\ModuleDefinition.cs:line 516\r\n
>     at Mono.Cecil.TypeReference.Resolve() in
> S:\\cecil\\Mono.Cecil\\TypeReference.cs:line 251\r\n
>     at
> AssemblyChangeDetector.CouplingTestSearchStrategy.TryInterfacePrune(String
> fullName, Int32 depth, List`1 breadCrumbs, CouplingCacheNode efferentEntry,
> TypeReference parentType, TypeDefinition definition) in
> C:\\Users\\greg\\Desktop\\coupling\\AssemblyChangeDetector\\CouplingTestSearchStrategy.cs:line
> 180\r\n
> Do I need to grab a lock somewhere etc?
> --
> Les erreurs de grammaire et de syntaxe ont été incluses pour m'assurer de
> votre attention
>
> --
> --
> mono-cecil

-- 
--
mono-cecil

Reply via email to