AFAIK the generic aricity (that's what the backtick+number is called, the number of generic parameters) is not part of any standards but rather a convention employed by compilers to easily differntiate between generic and non-generic types, though the runtime is perfectly capable of doing so without the backticks in the name.
I would need to dig up a reference, think it was mentioned in Serge Lidins Assembler book. Regards, Johannes On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 5:18 PM, reichertj <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2 Jan., 16:13, Jonathan Pryor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thus, this is By Design. > > ah, OK! I thought that Cecil does not replicate System.Reflection, but > ECMA-335. > But searching the ECMA pdf for '``' yielded no result... > Is '``' indeed just a syntax element of IL and not defined in > ECMA-335? > > Confused, > Joachim > > -- > -- > mono-cecil -- -- mono-cecil
