but be careful, it can have a big result on your memory footprint. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: > If you use separate resolvers you can read many assemblies in > parallel, we do this. > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Simon Cropp <[email protected]> wrote: >> The reason I ask is becasue for my many of use cases reading and >> writing the assembly can take over 50% of the processing time >> >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Let me be perfectly clear : maybe. >>> >>> Seriously, I don't think there are many things easily parallelizable >>> in Cecil without adding lots of locking. >>> >>> On Tuesday, February 15, 2011, Simon Cropp <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> JB >>>> >>>> Do you have an plans to make use of multiple threads when reading and >>>> writing assemblies with cecil? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> mono-cecil >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> mono-cecil >> >> -- >> -- >> mono-cecil > > > > -- > Les erreurs de grammaire et de syntaxe ont été incluses pour m'assurer > de votre attention >
-- Les erreurs de grammaire et de syntaxe ont été incluses pour m'assurer de votre attention -- -- mono-cecil
