On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > No I think you're right, it looks a Cecil issue, due to the way custom > attributes are encoded. I'll see about fixing it directly in Cecil, > but as a workaround, you can indeed hunt those down.
Actually, it looks like the code is supposed to handle this. Could you provide something to reproduce this? Jb -- -- mono-cecil
