No, no, all is ok )))) Thank you very much for great help! On 24 май, 14:12, Gábor Kozár <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree, it's not very intuitive, but that's how it works. You may write > extension methods, or use ones that I've shown in the discussion to ease the > problem. > If you can implement it better, please go ahead. > > 2011/5/24 Stanislav <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > when you Resolve() a TypeReference or MethodReference (or any > > > other reference), you loose all generic arguments. You have to then > > restore > > > those generic arguments by essentially cloning the MethodReference (in > > your > > > case), except setting its DeclaringType to the original TypeReference > > (which > > > still contains the generic arguments). > > > It looks like bug, not as feature ) > > > -- > > -- > > mono-cecil
-- -- mono-cecil
