I will Jb. Thanks for pointing that out. On 8 juil, 14:57, Jb Evain <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Indiefreaks.com > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Make a FieldReference and use that instead of a FieldDefinition in > >> whatever place you're getting the error. > > > But then I won't be able to add it to the class Fields collection: how > > can I let the class type know of its existence then? > > > Since FieldDefinition inherits from FieldReference, casting to > > FieldReference should work, shouldn't it? > > We have nice threads in this group about how to deal with generics. > Look them up. > > Jb
-- -- mono-cecil
