Hey,
I suggest you compile your sample (obviously, you'll have to fix it first to
make Class extend Base) and have a look at the metadata produced using
ildasm/monodis.
There's no link between a TypeDef row and a MethodImpl row, so Class does need
to have a method which overrides IClass.A.
Jb
On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:25 PM, Janusz Lembicz wrote:
> From what I can see Cecil API doesn't allow to create a row in the
> MethodImpl table for the type that implements an interface, but the
> method that override an interface method come from it's base type.
>
> public interface IClass
> {
> void A();
> }
>
> public class Base
> {
> public void A() {}
> }
>
> public class Class : IClass
> {
> }
>
> Is that intentional? I'd like to be able to specify in the type Class
> that method A() from the interface IClass is implemented by method A
> from the type Base, what is valid according to ECMA-335 22.27, in case
> one of them happened to be renamed. Please let me know if I'm getting
> something wrong here. Thanks.
>
>
> --
> --
> mono-cecil
--
--
mono-cecil
