Would you accept that patch into cecil? I know its about the unmanaged resources, but its useful. Also, would you accept a version with xmldocblocks?
Thanks, Justin On Wednesday, January 2, 2013 8:29:26 AM UTC-5, Justin Dearing wrote: > > Thanks!! > > On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 6:13:43 AM UTC-5, Jb Evain wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> You'd have to write the ILRepack guys, they wrote this piece of code >> specifically for ILRepack. It doesn't come from the vanilla Cecil. >> >> Best, >> >> Jb >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Justin Dearing <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I'm trying to understand what Mono.Cecil.PE.ResourceEntry.Id is >> exactly? Are >> > those Ids well known numbers that tell the resource type or are they >> > arbitarly assigned? If so where are they defined? They don't seem to be >> > defined here: >> > >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms648009(v=vs.85).aspx >> >> > >> > That msdn page is inconsistent with my experiments. However, what I >> have >> > noticed is that all .NET assemblies seem to have a resource with an Id >> of 0 >> > that contains the VarFileInfo block. Is that guaranteed or purely by >> > convention? The reason is I am trying to understand some warning in >> > IL-Repack I talk about here: >> https://github.com/gluck/il-repack/issues/25 >> > >> > Thanks in Advance for any help, >> > Justin >> > >> > -- >> > -- >> > mono-cecil >> > -- -- mono-cecil
