May this be a problem with generic types? I suppose this only occurs for 
generic types because for generic types the reflector shows something like 
this

FTRACEDOMAIN_AEE2EE2A_67c3e758-a6a1-45eb-9e59-9ff194abcc53 
<http://127.0.0.1/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx?Target=code://MeVis.Common.Utilities:3.0.0.0/MeVis.Common.Utilities.StatefulValue<,>/FTRACEDOMAIN_AEE2EE2A_67c3e758-a6a1-45eb-9e59-9ff194abcc53:syngo.Common.Diagnostics.Tracing.FTraceDomain>
 = new FTraceDomain 
<http://127.0.0.1/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx?Target=code://syngo.Common:1.0.0.0:008145f79b9aec14/syngo.Common.Diagnostics.Tracing.FTraceDomain/.ctor(System.Type)>(typeof(StatefulValue
 
<http://127.0.0.1/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx?Target=code://MeVis.Common.Utilities:3.0.0.0/MeVis.Common.Utilities.StatefulValue<,>><,>));


What returns typeof(somegenerictype<>) ???


Am Donnerstag, 5. Februar 2015 09:07:46 UTC+1 schrieb Reh Gina:
>
> That makes no sense. I simply inject the initialization of a static member 
> into the static constructor. Looks like this afterwards (from reflector):
>  
> static *VersionMessage 
> <http://127.0.0.1/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx?Target=code://MeVis.MeVisLab.RemoteClient:3.0.0.0/MeVis.MeVisLab.RemoteClient.Messages.VersionMessage/.cctor()>*()
> {
>     FTRACEDOMAIN_AEE2EE2A_319e3e9d-6fab-4076-9a42-108dc52c976b 
> <http://127.0.0.1/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx?Target=code://MeVis.MeVisLab.RemoteClient:3.0.0.0/MeVis.MeVisLab.RemoteClient.Messages.VersionMessage/FTRACEDOMAIN_AEE2EE2A_319e3e9d-6fab-4076-9a42-108dc52c976b:syngo.Common.Diagnostics.Tracing.FTraceDomain>
>  = new FTraceDomain 
> <http://127.0.0.1/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx?Target=code://syngo.Common:1.0.0.0:008145f79b9aec14/syngo.Common.Diagnostics.Tracing.FTraceDomain/.ctor(System.Type)>(typeof(VersionMessage
>  
> <http://127.0.0.1/roeder/dotnet/Default.aspx?Target=code://MeVis.MeVisLab.RemoteClient:3.0.0.0/MeVis.MeVisLab.RemoteClient.Messages.VersionMessage>));
> }
>
>
>
> The code which injects above line: 
>
>
>     /// <nn />
>     private static void 
> AddInitialisationOfFTraceDomainFieldToStaticConstructor(
>       ModuleDefinition module,
>       TypeDefinition type,
>       MethodDefinition staticConstructor)
>     {
>       staticConstructor.Body.SimplifyMacros();
>       Instruction firstInstruction = 
> staticConstructor.Body.Instructions.First();
>       ILProcessor ilProcessor = staticConstructor.Body.GetILProcessor();
>
>       Instruction loadClassTypeInstruction = 
> Instruction.Create(OpCodes.Ldtoken, type);
>       ilProcessor.InsertBefore(firstInstruction, loadClassTypeInstruction);
>
>       Instruction callGetTypeInstruction = Instruction.Create(OpCodes.Call,
>       module.Import(typeof(System.Type).GetMethod("GetTypeFromHandle")));
>       ilProcessor.InsertAfter(loadClassTypeInstruction, 
> callGetTypeInstruction);
>
>       var domainConstructor =
>         
> typeof(syngo.Common.Diagnostics.Tracing.FTraceDomain).GetConstructor(new[] { 
> typeof(Type) });
>       var domainConstructorReference = module.Import(domainConstructor);
>       Instruction domainConstructorInstruction = 
> Instruction.Create(OpCodes.Newobj, domainConstructorReference);
>       ilProcessor.InsertAfter(callGetTypeInstruction, 
> domainConstructorInstruction); // create new instance of person
>       Instruction popFTraceDomainVariableInstruction = 
> Instruction.Create(OpCodes.Stsfld, _fTraceDomainField);
>       
>       ilProcessor.InsertAfter(domainConstructorInstruction, 
> popFTraceDomainVariableInstruction);
>
>       staticConstructor.Body.OptimizeMacros();
>     }
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 4. Februar 2015 17:18:44 UTC+1 schrieb Jb Evain:
>>
>> I'll go out on a limb an suggest your field initializer is taking a 
>> lot of memory? :) 
>>
>> Can you show what you're injecting? 
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Reh Gina <[email protected]> wrote: 
>> > Via injection I am adding a static field into a static class which 
>> already 
>> > contains two static fields. Injection code checks if static constructor 
>> is 
>> > already available, otherwise it will create one. In this case the 
>> static 
>> > constructor is available and the initialization of the static field is 
>> just 
>> > added before the existing instructions. At run time an 
>> OutOfMemoryException 
>> > occurs if accessing the injected object. 
>> > Does anybody has an Idea what can cause this exception? 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > -- 
>> > -- 
>> > mono-cecil 
>> > --- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups 
>> > "mono-cecil" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an 
>> > email to [email protected]. 
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>
>

-- 
-- 
--
mono-cecil
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mono-cecil" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to