Hi!, I'm answering inline:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Greg Rosenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > What does the MetadataType enum indicate exactly, and what do some of its > values mean? Most of them are pretty obvious, but a few are difficult to > understand: I suggest having a look at the ECMA-335 as Cecil is borrowing the naming from it. > Also, I'm having trouble understand how Resolve() works when used on > references to generic methods. Resolve returns a definition, that by definition is not instantiated. > I have a method like (C#): T GetComponent<T>() > I have a reference to it: !!0 GetComponent<Faction>() > the ElementMethod of this reference is: !!0 GetComponent() > But when I resolve any of the above the above, I get the definition: T > GetComponent() > > If I then have the following code: > >> var instMethod = new GenericInstanceMethod(resolvedMethodDefinition); >> instMethod.GenericArguments.Add(...) //fully parameterize it > > > instMethod is still: > >> T GetComponent<Faction>() > > > This return type seems unresolved, and when I run the assembly, it doesn't > function properly due to TypeLoadExceptions and InvalidProgramException > about invalid IL. That doesn't seem to be the issue, il the IL generic parameters are not replaced by their closed types in signatures. I suggest running peverify on the resulting assembly to understand the issue. Jb -- -- -- mono-cecil --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mono-cecil" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
