Nice! :) On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM float trunks <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'll have to surprise you then because it actually does work. Just as I > had posted this I removed the pop instruction and looked at the IL in > ildasm, > which actually showed the right IL (ILSpy didn't). > So I tried running the code again and it worked just as it was supposed > to. So for (static) managed calls, calli with generic arguments seems to be > ok. > > I've done some rough performance benchmarks which show that this current > method is actually about twice as slow as a delegate call (even with IL > that is a bit more > optimized and AggresiveInlining enabled on the method). > This surprised me, as some performance tests on non-generic calli > implementations actually showed a general increase in speed. > > Anyways, this specific issue seems to be solved. So for future reference: > It does work, I just don't know why it didn't in the first place. > > -- > -- > -- > mono-cecil > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mono-cecil" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- -- mono-cecil --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mono-cecil" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
