Hello, I have an issue that the current NUnit 3.4.1 requires Mono.Cecil >= 0.9.6. But the mono tarball (even for 4.6.0 Beta) comes with Mono.Cecil 0.9.5, and even provides a mono-cecil.pc file and everything. So the rpm mono-core also delivers cecil.pc. In Fedora, we have a separate package for Mono.Cecil [1], and I would prefer that situation.
I notice that in mono master [2] cecil has been upgraded some weeks ago to current master of cecil, which is version 0.10.0 Beta. I still would prefer if external libraries are not that hard bundled into Mono, at least not delivered in the rpm. I am trying to patch the bundled version of Cecil out in my spec file, but that is quite strange and does not look nice. I think we should aim for the clear and clean way. I wonder how we can cleanly resolve this situation. Or should I aim to have two versions of Mono.Cecil on the system? Any thoughts? Should I prepare a pull request? Thanks, Timotheus [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/mono-cecil.git/tree/ [2] https://github.com/mono/cecil _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dot.net/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
