Hi,
(B
(BHmm, I think there is no preprocessor directive for jay. And those
(Bfiles are compiled at a time in shape of .cs files.
(B
(BAtsushi Eno
(B
(BBen Maurer wrote:
(B> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 06:43 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote:
(B>
(B>>Hi,
(B>>
(B>>I wonder which is the best way to have "almost duplicate" but
(B>>different parser/tokenizer pair for XSLT "Pattern" apart from
(B>>XPath (I'm going to fix a bug that allows improper XPath for
(B>>XSLT pattern e.g. namespace::*).
(B>>
(B>>With my way to do, they could be generated by attached patches:
(B>>
(B>> $ patch -i pattern-parser.diff System.Xml.XPath/Parser.jay -o
(B>> System.Xml.XPath/PatternParser.jay
(B>> $ patch -i pattern-parser.diff System.Xml.XPath/Tokenizer.cs -o
(B>> System.Xml.XPath/PatternTokenizer.cs
(B>> $ patch -i use-pattern-parser.diff
(B>>
(B>>... but I wonder if there are better ways to do handle those
(B>>parser/tokenizer stuff, because parser/tokenizer patches are easy
(B>>to become broken when we fix XPath parser and/or tokenizer sources.
(B>>
(B>>Would it be better if I just put another parser/tokenizer pair?
(B>
(B>
(B> Could we do an ifdef with jay and compile it twice?
(B>
(B> -- Ben
(B>
(B>
(B
(B_______________________________________________
(BMono-devel-list mailing list
([email protected]
(Bhttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
