Hi, Atsushi. We indeed have our own project files so we can cleanly have two different files implementations. I'd like to suggest the following as a naming convention for our specific files: XslDecimalFormat.jvm.cs What do you think?
Eyal. On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Atsushi Eno wrote: > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:45:40 +0900 > From: Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Andrew Skiba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: mono-devel mailing list <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com> > Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] TARGET_JVM in XslDecimalFormat.cs > > Hello, > > Andrew Skiba wrote: > > This class has a trivial implementation on Java (according to XSLT > > spec). So there is almost no common code here. What is better, to insert > > the implementation into the same file, or to separate files? The > > attached patch uses the first method. > > The implementation looks totally different one, so let's just have a > different source. I guess, you guys anyways have different set of > sources, right? So We can just checkin your source file into > mcs/class/System.XML/Mono.Xml.Xsl and we can just ignore it while > you can just ignore existing XslDecimalFormat.cs. > > Atsushi Eno > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
