>> Just to make sure: "GH" is "GrassHopper", right?
;-) absolutely.
Atsushi Eno wrote:
Hi again,
I think there are some patches that are rejected because they
resulted in regressions. That's why such inconsistency has
happened. I cannot call them "regressions".
(Just to make sure: "GH" is "GrassHopper", right? Maybe many of
the readers don't understand what it is.)
Atsushi Eno
Andrew Skiba wrote:
Hi again.
I think my mission with W3C testsuite is done. Few thinks that can be
improved I listed in TODO file, but the suite can be used already.
I ran this suite against the last GH System.Xml and Mono, and there
were 10 fixes and 62 regressions. I devided all tests that fail on
mono into 2 groups - those that fail on also on GH I put to
knownFailures.lst, and those specific to mono are listed in
fixme.lst. We need to understand those regressions before we can use
SVN instead of our current code.
Next thing, I will make XSLT testsuite to provide the similar
information.
Regards,
Andrew.
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
