If you can make them understand the power behing open source I think they
will let it released.:)
Open source is good for them as well, as currently they have a version. They
paid for it. But unless they pay for it again and again it's bugs won't be
fixed and it will be outdated after some time.
But if they release it as open source other people can fix and imporve it
(in other words maintain it), and they will benefit this as well.
And of course we could use it.:)
Kornél
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthijs ter Woord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Will Weisser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class
Well, you could always ask your employer :-)
Greets,
Matthijs ter Woord
----- Original Message -----
From: "Will Weisser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 7:20 PM
Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] system class
As I understand it the main difficulty in dealing with Microsoft's WMI
implementation is that it runs over DCOM and not a standard protocol
such as HTTP.
I wrote a C# DCOM stack and WMI implementation for my company, but since
they own it and not me I can't release it into the Mono class libs.
-W.W.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthijs
ter Woord
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:00 PM
To: Rafael Ferreira
Cc: Robert Jordan; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class
Hmm, how about OpenWBEM? WMI is supposed to be an implementation of the
WBEM
standard, OpenWBEM too.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthijs ter Woord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com>; "Robert Jordan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class
yeah its called snmpd :-)
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 16:10 +0200, Matthijs ter Woord wrote:
> OK, i agree, but i actually mean a software package which provides
roughly
> the same functionality.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] system class
>
>
> > Matthijs ter Woord wrote:
> > > Are there any WMI alternatives on linux (opensource/closed
source)?
> >
> > An implementation of the "Windows Management Instrumentation"
> > for Linux? :-)
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
