Maxime de Lavenne wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of James Mansion
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:28 AM
To: Jonathan Pryor
Cc: Dave Cramer; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Mono-dev] Re: What would you like to see in Mono?
One problem with this: none of it is standardized. Red Hat
will differ
>from SuSE will differ from Debian will differ from...
Sure - but surely you define an interface, and the
environment can define a localised implementation for your
flavour of UNIX.
Hopefully this would not be Linux specific, but would be
achievable on Solaris and *BSD too. (And who cares about AIX, eh? ;-))
I don't think Mono should have to ship with all possible
implementations - a couple and a null implementation that
throws NotImplemented or similar should be enough.
I don't understand that approach. Java's JVM works out of the box on all
systems (or please slam me if I am wrong :)
Why can't mono ?
You're out of context. The original question of this subthread was:
"I want to see a system wide api in Mono (sonthing like System.linux or
linux.system). By using this u can handle any kind of stuff on linux.
Everything (i.e. services, cronjobs, even kernel resources etc ) on
linux can be handled directly without calling any other api (or system
call)."
Robert
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
