Hey, I tried your sample with .Net 2.0, and got:
controller = System.Windows.Forms.PrintControllerWithStatusDialog Probably in .Net 1.1 it's handled different (if you are using that version, of course). Carlos. El mié, 02-08-2006 a las 07:45 -0400, Chris Toshok escribió: > this doesn't work unless System.Windows.Forms is being used, it appears. > > The following test: > > using System; > using System.Drawing; > using System.Drawing.Printing; > > public class Foo { > public static void Main (string[] args) { > PrintDocument doc = new PrintDocument (); > > Console.WriteLine ("controller = {0}", > doc.PrintController.GetType()); > } > } > > outputs: > > controller = System.Drawing.Printing.StandardPrintController > > Chris > > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 04:30 -0500, Carlos Alberto Cortez wrote: > > Hey, > > > > S.D.Printing.PrintDocument.PrintController has as default a new instance > > of S.W.F.PrintControllerWithStatusDialog, which is in SWF assembly. > > > > The current code assigns a new instance of S.D.P.StandardPrintController > > to PrintDocument.PrintController, which isn't the right behaviour. > > > > The problem is that it's not a good idea to add System.Windows.Forms as > > a reference to the System.Drawing assembly IMHO. So, the approach is to > > load the SWD assembly using reflection and then cache the type .ctor. > > > > > > Also, PrintDocument.PrintController should be never null, and should get > > a new PrintControllerWithStatusDialog instance, just like .Net does. > > > > Carlos. > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list