Hi, I'd agree that calling it 2.0 would confuse the issue with .net 2.0 support....
My (unimportant) 2 cents ;p Martin On 10/4/06, Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We have always been thinking that the next release of Mono would be > "1.2" which would flag an incremental update to Mono 1.0, but this is a > relatively large update as it contains a lot of functionality that was > not in Mono 1.0. > > I would even go as far as saying that we could feel confident that > this could be called "Mono 2.0", but 2.0 would have the unfortunate > effect of confusing people regarding our .net 2.0 support. > > So am thinking that maybe we could call this "Mono 1.5", or if we > plan on keeping the even/odd release numbers from the kernel that we > could call this Mono 1.6 or 1.8 > > Opinions? > > Miguel. > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > -- Martin Hinks http://www.m-s-d.net _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list