> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-devel-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno > Sent: woensdag 31 januari 2007 17:44 > To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] HttpWebRequest method patch > > Gert Driesen wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Robert Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com> > > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 12:46 PM > > Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] HttpWebRequest method patch > > > > > > > >> Hi Atsushi, > >> > >> Atsushi Eno wrote: > >> > >>> Well, it is very good idea to report this BUG to Microsoft and > >>> let them fix it. I will do that unless someone points out that > >>> our (a couple of lingr users') interpretation is wrong. > >>> > >>> I rather want judgement of the spec situation: whether HTTP methods > >>> like "posT" must retrieve request/response stream like POST. > >>> > >> Since Apache & IIS are both accepting case-insensitive method names > >> it's a good idea to switch to POST-like behavior in HttpWebRequest, > >> as implied by your patch. > >> > >> Robert > >> > > > > Atsushi, have your decided against changing our implementation to > match that > > of MS ? > > > No, as I haven't removed the related test that you added without any > agreement.
Ok, no problem. I was just asking. > (If you are saying that marking test as [Ignore] is a decision while > adding test without any agreement is not a decision, it is very > strange.) If you want to make a big deal out of adding a test (which helped to find out how MS exactly behaves, and which was marked NotWorking), then please go ahead. Gert _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list