No matter how it works in your machine, the tests are indeed broken as monobuild shows. See System.ServiceModel test results: http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/python/monobuild.py http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/builds/HEAD/suse-101-i586/olive/98880/logs/test.log
BTW you always have meaningless ChangeLog entry such as: > Log: > fix implementation, refactoring but it is not true. For example for r98854 which you put *new file* which is neither implementation fix nor refactoring at all. Atsushi Eno Igor Zelmanovich wrote: > Hello Atsushi, > > There was some not implemented API in System.Configuration > I've implemented it in r98680 > > You have rebuild (and install) System.Configuration to have the tests > pass. > > I have no such regressions in my Ubuntu. > > If you still have any such regression, please send me exception's stack > trace. > Be sure I run nunit test suite each time I have commit. > > Igor Zelmanovich. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 1:50 PM > To: Igor Zelmanovich > Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Sys.SM.Configuration changes caused too much regressions > > Hello Igor, > > I usually don't care too much about NUnit test regressions in the > face of significant development in olive, but lately you broke too > much tests due to System.ServiceModel.Configuration improvements. > More than 10 tests now fails with NotImplementedException which > is raised inside configuration stuff. > > Please remove any configuration hook from existing working stuff > such as ChannelFactory. If you do not, I'll revert several things > instead next week, which could mess your work. Thanks in advance. > > Atsushi Eno > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
